Two rows circulated by email ..
Among the various issues raised during the election campaign as easily as you can see, talking about setting up a new party, a return to full democratic participation and talk about everything related to the themes of economic and social development. This is also the substance of our own election program and the challenge that arises at the local level and there will be a short (see recent works of Paul Landi and on the "Tirreno").
In this regard, such as fast food for thought, I send a biographical reference about a person, Roberto Ruffilli, to some 'years ago and promoted the same things he said in an authoritative and detailed and who has paid with his life for his passion real political and not related to patterns of power. I'll suggest having the extraordinary relevance of the issues that matter.
Ruffilli Roberto was born in Forlì in 1937 and in this city he studied until they reach high school, then moved to Milan where he attended the Faculty of Political Science within the Catholic University and graduated after a journey that see how the masters Gianfranco Miglio and Feliciano Benvenuti.
Log in academia, in the early seventies, as a historian of the Administration, then won in 1976, the contest on Contemporary History, a discipline that teaches at the university of Bologna until 1987, when he gets on the passage of History institutions, the material that best expresses his interest and his passion for politics.
His scientific production is a witness of his being, as was often called at the time of his death, "a teacher turned to politics."
Emblematic is in fact the focus of his studies on constitutional affairs married to the strong interest in the transformation of democratic regimes in the twentieth century, which fits within the genre its commitment to the initiation of institutional reforms in Italy.
E 'on this side that embodies the conflicted refusal of a road required for Italian democracy and yet the focus of some lines, we could call a program, very clear:
" we are Faced with the possibility for our country to pass an electoral democracy, however, hinges on a party-state , besieged by an opposition more or less revolutionary: the first involved in the occupation of power and the acceleration of the equipment and any cost of capitalist development and the second in employment in key anti-capitalist society. [.] There is the possibility of developing a political and social democracy, about the status of political parties and trade unions, self-government and reform, planning and participation. [.] all this. does not require such agreements on global models of society [.]. Instead requires the agreement on the definition of the rules of democracy, setting out the political responsibility for the design of change and social responsibilities for the management of services, and which ensures that one and the other under the effective control, electoral and non- of the masses and allowing them to directly manage the sacrifices a new expansion. " E 'here that is embodied the central idea of \u200b\u200bRuffilli professor and political idea that focuses on the political agenda of the return to the city of its role as arbitrator in the participatory democracy that Ruffilli had studied and who had undertaken to build if the design of those who do not believe in democracy and killed him.
These words make me think even our local situation, where a risk of "party-state" in local key can actually exist where at the moment, a single party in our PD, also focus across almost all positions of real power that are present in the area. Then one gets the importance to treat and the methods and criteria for effective participation in the real life of the party that we can see, in a sense, as the two-way mirror in the levels of democracy and real participation that are expressed in our area. Share and democratically participate in the two basic conditions are essential to set up a democratic process to be effective and deliver social value.
Thank you and Happy Easter to all, Daniel
Among the various issues raised during the election campaign as easily as you can see, talking about setting up a new party, a return to full democratic participation and talk about everything related to the themes of economic and social development. This is also the substance of our own election program and the challenge that arises at the local level and there will be a short (see recent works of Paul Landi and on the "Tirreno").
In this regard, such as fast food for thought, I send a biographical reference about a person, Roberto Ruffilli, to some 'years ago and promoted the same things he said in an authoritative and detailed and who has paid with his life for his passion real political and not related to patterns of power. I'll suggest having the extraordinary relevance of the issues that matter.
Ruffilli Roberto was born in Forlì in 1937 and in this city he studied until they reach high school, then moved to Milan where he attended the Faculty of Political Science within the Catholic University and graduated after a journey that see how the masters Gianfranco Miglio and Feliciano Benvenuti.
Log in academia, in the early seventies, as a historian of the Administration, then won in 1976, the contest on Contemporary History, a discipline that teaches at the university of Bologna until 1987, when he gets on the passage of History institutions, the material that best expresses his interest and his passion for politics.
His scientific production is a witness of his being, as was often called at the time of his death, "a teacher turned to politics."
Emblematic is in fact the focus of his studies on constitutional affairs married to the strong interest in the transformation of democratic regimes in the twentieth century, which fits within the genre its commitment to the initiation of institutional reforms in Italy.
E 'on this side that embodies the conflicted refusal of a road required for Italian democracy and yet the focus of some lines, we could call a program, very clear:
" we are Faced with the possibility for our country to pass an electoral democracy, however, hinges on a party-state , besieged by an opposition more or less revolutionary: the first involved in the occupation of power and the acceleration of the equipment and any cost of capitalist development and the second in employment in key anti-capitalist society. [.] There is the possibility of developing a political and social democracy, about the status of political parties and trade unions, self-government and reform, planning and participation. [.] all this. does not require such agreements on global models of society [.]. Instead requires the agreement on the definition of the rules of democracy, setting out the political responsibility for the design of change and social responsibilities for the management of services, and which ensures that one and the other under the effective control, electoral and non- of the masses and allowing them to directly manage the sacrifices a new expansion. " E 'here that is embodied the central idea of \u200b\u200bRuffilli professor and political idea that focuses on the political agenda of the return to the city of its role as arbitrator in the participatory democracy that Ruffilli had studied and who had undertaken to build if the design of those who do not believe in democracy and killed him.
These words make me think even our local situation, where a risk of "party-state" in local key can actually exist where at the moment, a single party in our PD, also focus across almost all positions of real power that are present in the area. Then one gets the importance to treat and the methods and criteria for effective participation in the real life of the party that we can see, in a sense, as the two-way mirror in the levels of democracy and real participation that are expressed in our area. Share and democratically participate in the two basic conditions are essential to set up a democratic process to be effective and deliver social value.
Thank you and Happy Easter to all, Daniel
