Rosetta Stone Rsd. Files Player

Primary and antidotes for political self

Intervention published in "Il Tirreno" October 2007

primary, primary, no. The Democratic Party is already born and surprised us. I was among those contributing in my small way in this process for some time, has criticized certain methods cooptativi in \u200b\u200bthe composition of the lists and, sometimes, a certain spirit orders that often arises in this complex phase of the constitution of a new party. But inevitably some of the results of the method, which can be defined as the patrimony of the entire policy and not just a party, have already made some important signal and that in many, including myself, did not expect.
I am referring to the fact that some lists created as interpreted and "institutional" that is, where were present several important elements of various local establishment (mayors and local administrators in the first place), have lost support in an overall positive for the ways and issues of voter participation. Look at ', the "people" have voted at the same time a secretary and expressed an opinion on local government. Because like it or not this has happened and we must take note of it without hiding behind the alleged errors and misunderstandings of logos on the cards, because they may offend the intelligence of everyone who came out to vote.
So, amid all the countless in-depth analysis you are doing, I think it's important not to lose Having regard to the substance of what happened. The problem is that to stay the course and not to disappoint the expectations of those who voted gave confidence to this great change. In this light, a long time, is the participation of persons giving information to the policy and certainly the instrument and the method of the primary, although improvements in some aspects, is a point of no return.
do not understand, frankly, how we can put the slightest doubt that now that the PD is born you should not proceed to use the approach of starting with the primary local administrative elections at least for the choice of mayor.
The past is history, finished. And with these primary must understand that it is Gone are the cryptic language and returns through the phase of the constitution, to give real value to the policies. It also must end the era of "automatism" of the mandate and charge and that those who are called to lead a city or going to do the secretary of the PD at the local level, will be chosen by all voters and party supporters, not by the so-called "oligarchs." We did it for the secretary of national and regional ones, because we can not do it locally? The debate is open, the constituent phase has begun, the confidence of those who voted not to be betrayed. We all do is to monitor and contribute proactive in this work, in the interest of the entire political community. Daniel
Bettinetti

How Long Does Weave Stay In Hair

Civilization, legality and participation

Intervention published in "Il Tirreno, Livorno in October 2007.

civilization, law and participation. Three words that have been together if only because it marked the city's events this summer. Once again many of the problems raised, even very serious, and unfortunately, against a disturbing perception of inadequacy in the quality of policy and manner of responses.
This raises the question say "quality of governance" which translated means to understand in what spirit, with reference to such values \u200b\u200band how design capability acts who have the task of translating policy into concrete actions.
Civilization. The first reference that comes to mind first is the plight of Roma children and makes me ask a simple question that with all due respect, the blog opened by the mayor with little response. What is the social project realistically projected on a medium to long term in which all the problems of an entire city community (and the chapter rom is only a part) can be as much as possible, converted into value and opportunity for all? May not be able to trigger a serious debate and really extended to all citizens (and not only to operators) about the quality and results of social policy in our country?
Legality. I get to mind the episode of the famous paintings found in the headquarters of the Port of Livorno in 2000 and the rest of the vicissitudes that have involved the same company in recent months, as indicated. Why, given the strategic importance of such a company and having regard to serious allegations, will not trigger a wider debate on the levels of legality and transparency with respect to economic and productive areas critical to Livorno? Again the policy where it is and what it offers with seriousness and competence, at least to clean up and bring a high level of perceived legality?
And finally, of course, participation. And here I am thinking Democratic Party primary, another great event. It 'came as a great opportunity to participate and many citizens, including myself, just saw it and were prepared for this path associated with informal and started over a year ago. Although it was known that the lists that will be voted on Oct. 14 will be "blocked" (ie no possibility of preferential voting on individual candidates), we imagined that at least we managed to create a dynamic high local input regarding the formation of names to be included, as I have heard that in other cities has occurred. Little or nothing of this, we largely was done to build the lists for co-optation between friendships and personal contacts and in substance in the first few established names and candidates that will remain "fixed". So what? I trust, nevertheless, I have not lost and I'm going to vote. But I wonder whether perhaps some old policy that has totally lost confidence in the people and yet so afraid to confront new modes participate. Dear Bishop
Ablondi you terribly right. Livorno We have to give a loose and it must be done with courage, responsibility and intellectual honesty by all, at any cost.

Progestrone Soft Gelatine Capsules Susten 200

Courage: analysis around each other Cecio-Guzzini

Intervention published in "Il Tirreno" July 2007

The case Cecio-Guzzini beyond how you think and trying to go beyond any responses to heat, clearly raises questions that do not invest directly individuals but the quality of governance in recent years.
As a citizen as I do not ask what lies beyond the official statements that were read in the press when it would be imperative to give answers at all about what actually happened in all these great urban operations, beginning with Save 2. At least this is what the process has brought to light and triggering a duty to request clarifying general public.
I talk about political class in general and not because the majority or minority, from a mere reader of the newspapers, I remember sitting in the City Council which is given to these operations without the placet there ever been any real opposition (by opposition parties that, if I remember correctly, but abstained ensured the presence and the number legally required to approve the resolutions and never really complain if not in words). Because these things do not point out anyone? Why does not trigger a public debate on this? The "rules" of the plans, which then direct impact on our quality of life and possibility, are so clear and understood by all? It 'possible that Livorno are only those of the vernacular (with all the sympathy) and Livorno Calcio or maybe there is someone else who "thinks" and that a profound spirit of Livorno (and without conceit), he might have worked and studied around the world and that might have something to say and really want to participate?
This is important because if you want to "reconquer" the people you need to do a transaction transparency and have the courage to assume responsibility for all policy decisions and situations that do not currently appear still imperfectly understood. Meanwhile, one thing is clear and secure the acquittal of Cecio and Guzzini.
And if it's true acquittal is treated as a citizen I must ask myself if it were valid criticisms that were made at the time Cecio and from his party and that there is a real need clarification on the presence or absence of certain rules and shared with respect to such important areas throughout the city as those related to urban development.
Courage. The courage to be citizens, the courage of those who have the responsibility to govern a territory and then the courage to aim high and have a vision that goes just a little 'beyond the problems of Lucarelli's turn. Livorno
As citizens in general, please allow me, we should start to be henceforth a little 'less apathetic and moaning and having the courage to participate in the construction of a political class that makes us feel truly represented.
How administrators have the courage to always clear how the spirit of service is something that we talk a little but that you live every moment. Even knowing that the weight of responsibility is often more a burden than an honor recognized.
Finally, the courage of a vision. That's a city open to the world that is born and must find his way in the world according to the vocation that has given birth and who represents the spirit of everyone who lives there. Daniel
Bettinetti