Piero Mulassano left us 73 years. He was a character. TO None was a leading issue and discussed the social and public life at the turn of the fifties and seventies. He grew up in Catholic who was then the only meeting point for young people and families. In all its expressions parish, community and political, the Catholic world disputing the leadership of the local community with all the other (the laity and the "independent" of the Bell matrix liberal). The competition was lively, but the two competing worlds had in common the ill-concealed desire to direct the cabin appeared as little as possible. He was not with the latter, but one of the first was regarded with suspicion because of his commitment to the FIM-CISL union. Fiat was a factory worker. Like all young cislini of those years, was influenced by the message Kennedy on the new frontiers of poverty alleviation and the opening of the Council encouraged him. He preferred to talk instead of comfortably silent. Paid dear that strange craving for a bridge to the integration of southerners who came in waves, called the economic miracle of cars and household appliances.
He got the insane idea of \u200b\u200bleading the local elections of 1965, a list of just the south. He had never done. Shield Crusader Campanile and not content with its resounding defeat, but in later years engulfed in the ridicule. He was accused of playing politics where politics was not considered a normal act of freedom, but a culpable failure of social harmony, a sensational and provocative violation of an unwritten code and just so strictly observed by all.
Its leisure and cultural Via Roma (formerly White Cross, then Turin, and now the Club Tavern) attracted young people in droves for a few years and was even shown to the attention of law enforcement because they guard against the intrusion of admissions union, socialist and communist. Then came the wind of the dispute. Instead of denying our political commitment, we claim him to his face, sweeping away all the lecture that there were Ammanniti objectivity, the interclass, impartiality and sugared via social conflict.
The arrival of the South, that indigenous people - believers or not we were - we do not like that so soon aspire to win even a shared representation. They had to ask permission from the local elite that they would be accepted under their protective wings and they would be presented as proof of the pride and tolerance, openness and liberality. The Southerners had to think to work in industry and construction. They had to pay the rent of the houses that were (usually the worst). They had to thank for the welcome.
Now, everything has changed. Fortunately we have other problems. Not so simple, I see. But we must recognize that the long march on the road always unfinished equality also saw the generous contributions of Piero Mulassano. Gained nothing from his religious choices, and political union. The last part of his life was unfairly isolated and troubled.
Mario Dellacqua
0 comments:
Post a Comment